Defamation of Character
Blogging is an interesting subject matter, and one that is topic du jour. More to the point, the use of blog content to sell newspapers. At the moment it seems to be the Daily Snail (Mail) who either steal content or defame people who have blogs. So, NML, who has been defamed by those idiots over at the Daily Snail, has put out the word, that she wants to set the record straight, and so she should. Shame on reporters who make things up, just to try and sell papers. Papers that are worth nothing more than floor covering for puppies. Anyway, below is the post that Natalie has published. You can get to Natalie’s site by clicking on the link under the post.
I will admit this does feel a little like the bit in Hackers (yeah I know) where the word goes out to “Hack the Planet!”. Blogs are a right for all those who have them. Freedom of speech reigns in countries that permit it. So we should all stand together united.
“Thursday, May 08, 2008
The Daily Mail Newspaper Tells Everyone that I Blog for “E-Venge”
On April 30th just after 3.30pm, I snatched up my phone and bit the bullet. I called up the journalist that had ‘interviewed’ me (I say this loosely) and expressed my upset at her not actually stating that she was interviewing me and my concern that I would be included in a feature about revenge, which is not what I, or this blog are about. I told her quite shrilly (I was stressed for fecks sake) that I did NOT want to open the paper and see something like “Blogger gets revenge on ex with her blog!” or some other pathetic headline.
I went onto the Daily Mails supposed section for women yesterday and actually nearly threw up in shock!
“Don’t get mad, get E-VENGE!”
It’s even worse in the paper where just in case the Daily Mail hadn’t quite put the full boot into misrepresenting me and featuring me in article full of TWENTY SIX inaccuracies about me, they added a sub header of “It’s the new mantra for women using the internet to take revenge on cheating men”.
Really, I don’t think I have EVER been so angry!
I want to categorically state for the record that I did NOT set up this blog to take revenge on my ex. I set up this blog after a bad date with PC Plod, the extremely nice guy but incredibly boring copper. God that was almost four years ago!
I found out that my ex had been cheating after I started the blog - actually it was the following day. But actually, you don’t need me to tell you this because anybody can read go back and check the facts and see for themselves!
Just to show how inaccurate the Daily Mail are, let me give you some interesting figures:
In June 2004, my first month, I wrote 23 posts (yeah, I was single and used to update frequently!)
Out of 23 posts, only one post is dedicated to him which equals 4% of the content.
There are 2 more posts that make a reference to him. 1 post is a positive reference and 1 post is about men peeing on toilet seats and I wisecracked that he missed the rim.
In July 2004, I wrote 27 posts. 0 were dedicated to the subject of him. 2 made a reference to him and 1 made a reference to our engagement which I just realised that I have still forgotten to sell after FIVE years!
In August 2004, I wrote 22 posts. 0 were dedicated to the subject of him. 2 made a reference.
That means that out of 72 posts written in 3 months, 1 PERCENT of the posts were dedicated to him!
8% referenced him.
1% referenced the engagement ring.
Now what they don’t know is that FORTY THREE PERCENT!!! of posts in June 2004 seem to mention toilet seats and the fact that I was living with that strange man boy who literally couldn’t p*ss on a toilet seat to save his life!
Now, how the hell did the Daily Mail come up with the idea that I set up a revenge blog when I wasn’t even writing about him, never mind taking revenge? What was I doing? Taking revenge on toilet seats and men that can’t pee right?
Oh and I went from being engaged for 14/15 months (I forget now after soooo much time has passed) to being engaged for FIVE years! We’ve been broken up for five years and I’ve lived in London for seven… I’m only thirty so did they think I was some sort of frickin’ child bride?!
Twenty frickin’ bloody six inaccuracies or just outright fabrications about me in one poxy article and to add insult to injury, they didn’t even mention Baggage Reclaim which was the only reason why I had initially agreed.
Of course I have written to the Press Complaints Commission, the editor and yada, yada, yada, but the fact remains that their papers become someones loo roll the next day but that pile of shite that is their article is up online telling anyone and everyone that I am an e-venger. It’s pretty disgusting and what’s most appauling is that they have reduced four years of this blog, two and a half years of Baggage Reclaim, a year of Bambino Goodies, and various other blogs plus my contributing…to an act of revenge….against someone who didn’t even mean enough for me to even fully dedicate the one blog post about his cheating. I even said “The revelation last night doesn’t hurt, but it does anger me, but even that has passed.” and then in true me fashion, I rambled on about my period….
Oh and I know for a fact that they stopped publishing comments on the story yesterday as I was contacted by several people who said that they had commented to set the record straight. So not only do they want to put up 26 inaccuracies about me, but for some reason, they don’t want anyone to know about it…
If this was pre-internet days, I really would be up sh*ts creek without a paddle but thankfully the internet which has made me connect with thousands of people, make quite few friends and acquaintances, and even a stalker…has meant that at least I can respond.”